tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5273264.post-2056634619774917142007-02-27T12:07:00.000-08:002007-02-27T12:07:00.000-08:002007-02-27T12:07:00.000-08:00If WP didn't have a "liberal" bias, one might expe...If WP didn't have a "liberal" bias, one might expect a bit smaller outrage against competitors or those who claim it has such a bias.<BR/><BR/>And, while I don't have any figures, I'm going to guess that WP editors are majority "liberal", due to the presumption that they're majority young rather than old. Considered in the aggregate, that will tend to make most edits "liberal".<BR/><BR/>WP's policies also favor MSM sources and strongly disfavor "self-published" sources. By doing so they favor largely "liberal" MSM/mainstream thinking.<BR/><BR/>Here's a fun challenge to bloggers:<BR/>1. Someone other than me condemn the vandalism that "liberals" have wrought on CP.<BR/>2. Which links at WP don't have the nofollow tag, where do those lead, and how much would that be worth to the receiving sites in the open market?LonewackoDotComhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07513506972869398358noreply@blogger.com